JACC Journals’ Operating Policies effective:decisions for the Journal editors

We. FOR EDITORS

The Journals associated with United states College of Cardiology would be the formal peer-reviewed publications associated with United states College of Cardiology (ACC). The choices for the Journal editors and their particular panels are available in addition to the ACC, its publishing partner, or interests that are commercial. The ACC Publication & Education Coordination Committee, which states to the ACC Board of Trustee as well as the ACC Compensation Committee, maintains oversight the Journals, and it has authorized these working policies, that are proposed by the JACC Journals Editors in Chief. The JACC Journals Editors in Chief have the effect of the choice and handling of their particular panels.

A. Relationships with Industry

The Editors-in-Chief, Executive Editors, Deputy Editors and Associate Editors must reveal any appropriate relationships with industry (RWI) or possible disputes, and update those RWI on a yearly foundation within the ACC database.

Then he or she is not permitted to provide compensated editorial services for another cardiovascular or CV subspecialty journal, unless he or she obtain a waiver from the Editor-in-Chief and the ACC Board of Trustees if a member of the JACC journals’ Editorial Board receives compensation for serving on the Board. a template page for waivers can be acquired upon demand through the ACC Publishing Director.

B. Guest Editors

Guest Editors’ editorial decisions are required to be manufactured with no influence by the interior JACC panels. JACC journals’ papers are put within the Guest Editor procedure if:

• An author is contained by the paper whom functions as an Editor-in-Chief, Deputy/Executive, or Associate Editor on that board.
• The paper contains an writer through the institution that is editor-in-Chief’s
• An author is contained by the paper from an organization wherein almost all of Associate Editors practice/work.
• An author is contained by the paper that is a JACC journals’ Editor-in-Chief

If required, these documents also needs to go through a analytical review with a Guest Statistical Editor.

C. Plagiarism

In cases where a editor or reviewer raises a problem about plagiarism, that individual should always be informed that the Journal editors will perform a study. The paper will go through an assessment with all the CrossCheck software, accompanied by or associated with an editor’s review that is comparative. After those actions, the paper ought to be brought for conversation to your editorial board for a opinion choice.

The first step is to contact the author if clear plagiarism is identified (in other words., perhaps not paraphrasing/copying of short expressions just without attribution or redundancy, wherein there was copying through the author’s very own work), wherein there clearly was unattributed usage of big portions of text and/or information, presented just as if these people were by the writer. (The editors also might want to contact the writer if small copying is identified in basic terms/expressing dissatisfaction and describing the Journal’s position to inquire about writer to rephrase copied expressions or consist of as direct quotations with sources.)

Whenever calling the matching writer in writing, the JACC editors should enclose a finalized authorship declaration (or resume cover letter) saying that the presented work is original/the author’s own, along with documentary proof plagiarism. According to the author’s reaction or shortage thereof, the editors can determine whether or otherwise not to get hold of the co-authors or formally contact the author’s institution that is corresponding. The JACC journals’ ethics committee should be informed, if not prior to that decision if the decision is to contact corresponding author’s institution.

D. Corrections & Retractions

Four kinds of modifications are posted for significant errors associated with the JACC journals at the discretion of this editors.

• Erratum. Notification of a error that is important by the log, often pertaining to the information, which impacts the book record or the medical integrity associated with paper, or the standing of the authors, or for the Journal. The author that is corresponding be notified if any erratum had been become given, without his/her initial participation. Errata are going to be updated by having a notification on JACC.org, Science Direct, and PubMed.
• Corrigendum. Notification of a essential mistake made by the author(s), often pertaining to the info, which impacts the book record or even the systematic integrity associated with the paper, or perhaps the standing of the writers or the Journal. The matching writer will be notified if any corrigenda were become released, without his/her initial participation. In instances where coauthors disagree, the editors will determine whether a review that is additional necessary because of the editorial board or by an unbiased peer reviewer to impose the right amendment, noting the dissenting author(s) within the text regarding the posted variation. Corrigenda will soon be updated having a notification on JACC.org, Science Direct, and PubMed.
• Correction. On line modifications occur with information that will not influence the book record or perhaps the clinical integrity associated with the paper, or perhaps the standing of the writers or perhaps the log. The author that is corresponding be notified if any erratum had been become given, without his/her initial participation. Typically, modifications are produced online as soon as the writers have actually submitted institution or name inaccurately. On the web modifications are going to be updated on JACC.org and Science Direct, but won’t be updated on PubMed.
• Retraction. Book of invalid outcomes or circumstances where the Editor determines that that the paper takes a formal retraction in the record. But, the Editor will inform ACC leadership/General Counsel early within the retraction consideration procedure. The Editor will determine perhaps the manuscript eliminates discoverable by people, or if perhaps the retraction notice should stay with its spot. The matching writer will be notified if any retraction had been to be released, without his/her initial involvement. In instances where coauthors disagree, the editors will determine whether a extra review is necessary by the editorial board or by an unbiased peer reviewer to impose the right amendment, noting the dissenting author(s) into the text of this posted variation. Retractions may be updated with a notification on JACC.org, Science Direct, and PubMed.

(adjusted from Nature & Elsevier policies)

E. Preprint Server Policy

Public dissemination of manuscripts just before, simultaneous with, or after distribution to this log, such as for example publishing the manuscript on preprint servers or other repositories, is frustrated. We ask that writers disclose this given information through the distribution procedure, whilst the JACC Journals will likely not accept submissions which have formerly published for a preprint host.

F. Statistical Reviews

JACC journals’ original research documents ( maybe maybe not review articles) are generally delivered for analytical review after a paper is provisionally accepted. Nevertheless, if an editor thinks that a analytical review is required to see whether the paper must certanly be accepted, the statistician must certanly concluding sentences be invited since a reviewer in the paper. The range associated with the analytical review should be linked to the methodological application and results, certainly not the medical findings of this research.

G. Social Media Marketing

The JACC journals staff keeps 2 media that are social: JACC Journals Facebook web web page plus the @JACCjournals Twitter web web page. Content is done because of the JACC social networking editors, that are editorial board users and never ACC staff, to make certain medical and clinical precision. The tips for social networking, along with the JACC Journals recommendations. The ACC staff articles the information and manages the platforms. The United states healthcare Association (AMA) maxims of medical ethics act as a guide for article marketing and circulation in the JACC media platforms that are social.