This is an example essay on aftereffects of The Patriot Act.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are the ones associated with the authors and don’t necessarily reflect the views of LawTeacher.

The USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act) was established after 11, 2001 (9/11) when terrorists attacked the United States september.

The Patriot Act has raised many concerns about whether it infringes in the civil liberties of those of this nation. Looking back ever sold, our past presidents developed laws that have been the stone that is stepping the ideas that created the Patriot Act. The government’s job would be to protect the social people, nonetheless it has a larger job that is to protect the country. This has raised many issues involving the Patriot Act and whether or not it is more detrimental to us than it is helpful. The american people should be concerned with how much power our government has when developing laws governing our civil liberties in relation to the Patriot Act and how it deprives those accused under it of Constitutional rights.

On September 11, 2001 the United States (US) experienced the unthinkable when terrorists attacked the nation by itself soil. This is a eye that is serious or must I say reality look for the US. The united states has some of the very most sophisticated counter intelligence on earth but was not able to prevent such a tragedy. Why didn’t it is seen by them coming? Plenty of thing would be different today if that question could half been answered prior to 9/11.

<

This act was compiled from two documents, the Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (PATRIOT) through the House of Representatives (House) in addition to Uniting and Strengthening American (USA) Act from the Senate, was merged together creating the Patriot Act. In accordance with Lemieux, previous developed laws created by previous presidents to resolve conflicts were much like the Patriot Act they simply had different names Lemieux, M. (n.d.). Reputation for the united states Patriot Act. Retrieved April 9, 2011, from http://www.constitutiondenied.com/Media/History-Patriot-Act.pdf. The Aliens and Sedition Act of 1798 was created throughout the war with France since the US was afraid when it comes to country as well as the people and wanted to make sure the enemy failed to sleep amongst us. The president was able to have anyone that was believed to be a threat to the government would be arrested and deported with this power. Through the Civil War the president suspended Habeas Corpus when it comes to safety great things about the country, giving the us government the energy to imprison someone without sufficient evidence. During World War II, the President ordered over 10,000 American citizens that had not shown any disloyalty into the united states of america into confinement camps since they were of Japanese descent Lemieux, M. (n.d.). Reputation for the united states Patriot Act. Retrieved 9, 2011, from http://www.constitutiondenied.com/Media/History-Patriot-Act.pdf april. They are the stone that is stepping the development of the Patriot Act.

The Patriot Act has been around since as an answer towards the tragic events of 9/11. The bill that could come to be referred to as Patriot Act was introduced to Congress just days after 9/11. It was revised due to concerns from many congressmen that the bill allowed for too broad of a scope of power to federal authorities. Eventually following the bill was revised and reintroduced, Congress passed it with little to no opposition on 26, 2001 october. Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI), would up being the only senator to vote from the Patriot Act. Although the Patriot Act would not come into existence until after 9/11, it will have roots in earlier legislation. On 25, 1996, President Clinton signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act into law april. The bill for this statutory law was introduced after the Oklahoma City Bombing. The major provision for the act managed to get illegal to give you support that is“material to your organization banned by the state dept.. The bill was greatly criticized by Republicans for granting an excessive amount of capacity to authorities. The bill needed to undergo modifications that are major it absolutely was passed in 1996. The balance that ended up law that is becoming reported to be a “watered down version” of this original that President Clinton wanted passed. Strangely enough, it was this act that was revamped and broadened to produce the Patriot Act (Creative Commons, n.d.).

The Patriot Act has been highly criticized for being extremely broad and too open for interpretation since becoming law. In 2004, a judge ruled that components of the Patriot Act were unconstitutional simply because they were too vague as well as in violation for the First and Fifth Amendments. Another criticism regarding the Patriot Act is the fact that it will not guarantee enough oversight to make sure those that are given power because of the act usually do not misuse it. On March 9, 2006 President Bush signed the Patriot Act Reauthorization, but attached a statement that is signing which he said which he would ignore specific mandates written in the balance that would give more judicial and Congressional oversight to agencies authorized use of the act. In late March, letters were written to Alberto Gonzales, the Attorney General at the time, requesting to have the administration rescind the signing statement since they do not have force of law. In those letters, they cited Article 1, Section 7 for the Constitution which states that ‘Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives additionally the Senate, shall, if he approve he shall sign it, however, if not he shall return it. before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States;’ Alberto Gonzales and President Bush both ignored the letters rather than responded. Their argument was that the president could not change legislation that were passed by Congress and say which he did not agree with that he would ignore part of it. On 10, 2007, an appeals court upheld the 2004 ruling that parts of the Patriot Act were unconstitutional december. The court stated that a statute must allow for a person of average intelligence to be able to read and understand the law in the ruling. They found that certain parts of the act were too vague. They determined that in the event that law was worded in a manner that the average person could not understand, then the average person wouldn’t normally know if these people were committing a crime (Creative Commons, n.d.).

Even though many genuinely believe that our terrorist threat from other countries is fantastic, additionally there is driving a car of terrorist attacks in the US by its very own citizens. The Oklahoma City Bombing is a tragic example. In some instances, there clearly was a need for the government to suspect an American citizen and do surveillance to protect the united states from another such tragedy. The us government has been espionage that is doing for longer than most people think. It’s not a new practice, but with the technology we have today, it really is easier for authorities to collect intelligence. Despite the fact that they will have this technology at their disposal that will not mean that the Constitution can be ignored within the true name of protecting the united states.

One example associated with the Patriot Act being used this kind of a real way is in the case of Jose Padilla.

He was a Puerto Rican born citizen who later inside the life changed into Islam. He traveled throughout the Middle East and allegedly plotted with al Qaeda terrorists to detonate a “dirty bomb” in a US city. As soon he was detained as he stepped off a plane in the United States. The Bush Administration claimed though he was an American citizen because he had been deemed an “enemy combatant” by the president that he could be detained even. He had been then held in a brig that is military three and a half years and was allegedly subjected to torture as a result of US officials wanting to elicit information from him. paid homework help In those days, he had been not faced with any crimes even though it was said there was clearly overwhelming evidence against him. He was also take off from all communication along with his family and attorney (Martinez, 2007).